By using the survival of man as its means of justification, like "the livelihood for for 30,000 logging families"(Charles,K. , 2000), Charles is trying to say that logging is the right thing to do, but without a forest to begin with, there's nothing to log! The fact is due to global warming, forest fires and logging, major forests are being reduced to plains. If the situation continues, not only the owls but even humans will be in danger. As trees play a vital rule in reducing CO2, a catalyst to greenhouse effect. Just image, if all major forest were really to be logged, not only the owls but we will be in danger due to the greenhouse effect.
Although i believe Charles has the intentions of people in mind but i don't think i can totally agree with his view of things. The fact is people are simply borrowing the world and not returning. If is continues, we will eventually find ourselves living on scorched earth.(think of the movie "the chronicles of raddick") We must not forget that nature is not something some could just create. As we borrow form our earth we must not forget to return.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

